Ethical Dilemma Assignment-using restraints and seclusion in treatment Research Paper

respectable Dilemma Assignment-using restraints and seclusion in treatment facilities - Research Paper ExampleAccording to a study, both psychiatrical and emergency nurses assure the belief that these experiences of assault from patient is part of their profession and cannot be prevented (Haddad, 2004). This is quite a disturbing finding for those involved in providing mental health care. The Ethical Dilemma of Using Restraints in Treatment Facilities A patient receiving mental care behaves unpredictably. In some cases, they seem fine but suddenly come violent actsthrowing objects, screaming or shouting angrily, and even posing as a threat to himself or to others. For clinical nurse practitioners in the psychiatric unit, this is the unexampled dilemma they are facing to use restriction or not. What is the ethical dilemma here? Nurses are expected to understand their role in patients lives. When it comes to the psychiatric care, one particular role stands out above all elsethe nurse as an advocate for their patients (Park, 2009). It may be quite difficult to fight for the patients rights when go about with factors such as self- distressing behavior, aggression targeted towards health care professionals, and the call as to whether restrictions should be used. It is often confusing where nurses should lie now allow it be in their role in advocating patient right to life, personal freedom, safety and preservation of dignity or will the nurse follow hospital protocols and use seclusion or restriction measures to avoid in any occurrence of harm to anyone? Most often, the latter is the case not because it was the appropriate response but because it is the unbidden human response to feel anger or fear (Haddad, 2004). What guide must a nurse use in correctly addressing the situation and what is the upshot to this ethical dilemma? To make a nurse qualified for their roles in the hospital, ethical theories and principles have been established. Instructions have been specified to make the right choices. To start, ethical theories aim toward the achievement of an aggregate of objectivesbeneficence, least harm, respect for autonomy and justice--called ethical principles. Beneficence is concerned with doing good and is pertinent to the principle of utility where one aims to do the highest possible proportion of good over evil (Penslar, 1995). The next objective, least harm, is quite similar to the first principle. However, this is used when any decision made will have a malicious outcome. Respect for autonomy requires an ethical theory to result in patients complete dominance over their lives having the franchise to control the decisions which ultimately leads to the first principle of beneficence (Ridley, 1998 Ethical Principles, 2010). In relation to that, there are various perceptions of the connection between the two. Beneficence is minded(p) first concern rather than the autonomy of a person when viewing it paternalistically or the oppo site in a libertarian view. Moreover, an ethical theory must attain justice where fair actions are needed to resolve and is characterized by reasonable basis to (Ethical Principles, 2010). Moreover, nonmalificence differs from the least harm principle in that this aims to cause no harm at all and is considered to be of the greatest importance even if all principles are of the same significance in theory (Kitchener, 1984 Rosenbaum, 1982 Stadler, 1986). According to Rainbow